TALK TO AN EXPERT1-866-523-5551

California Mugshot Law: SB 1027 and Mugshot Removal Rights

California Mugshot Law beside california state map shape

Getting arrested in California is bad enough, but seeing your mugshot online, sometimes long after charges are dropped, can be devastating for your reputation.

To combat this, California passed SB 1027 in 2014, one of the first state laws aimed at shutting down the pay-to-remove mugshot industry. This law makes it illegal for websites to charge you money to remove or modify your booking photo, even if your case was dismissed or expunged.

Here’s what you need to know about the California mugshot law, how it works, and what you can do if your booking photo is still online.

Want to know more about mugshot laws? Check out our full article on Mugshot laws across the U.S.

What Is SB 1027?

SB 1027 directly targets websites that post arrest photos and then demand money to take them down. Before the law, many “mugshot rackets” exploited public records laws to embarrass people online and profit from their desperation.

Under California Penal Code § SB 1027, the law:

  • Bans pay-to-remove practices: No person or business can accept payment to remove or alter a mugshot.
  • Covers both print and online publications: It applies to any medium where mugshots are published, not just websites.
  • Treats each request as a separate violation: Every time a site asks for money to remove a photo, it counts as a new offense.
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       SB 1027|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 1027
          Author:   Hill (D), et al.
          Amended:  4/21/14
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 4/8/14
          AYES:  Jackson, Anderson, Corbett, Lara, Leno, Monning, Vidak


           SUBJECT  :    Booking photographs:  commercial use

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill prohibits the solicitation or acceptance of  
          a fee to remove, connect, or modify a booking photograph, but  
          exempts a public entity from the prohibition.

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:

          1.Declares, under the California Constitution, the people's  
            right to transparency in government.  

          2.Governs, under the California Public Records Act (CPRA), the  
            disclosure of information collected and maintained by public  
            agencies.  Generally, all public records are accessible to the  
            public upon request, unless the record requested is exempt  
            from public disclosure.  There are 30 general categories of  
            documents or information that are exempt from disclosure,  
            essentially due to the character of the information, and  
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    SB 1027
                                                                     Page  
          2

            unless it is shown that the public's interest in disclosure  
            outweighs the public's interest in non-disclosure of the  
            information, the exempt information may be withheld by the  
            public agency with custody of the information.  

          3.Makes certain criminal record information confidential but  
            requires state and local law enforcement agencies to make  
            public specified information, including the full name,  
            physical description, date and time of arrest, time and date  
            of booking, and factual circumstances surrounding an arrest,  
            except to the extent that disclosure of a particular item of  
            information would endanger the safety of a person involved in  
            an investigation or would endanger the successful completion  
            of the investigation or a related investigation.  

          4.Allows, under the Information Practices Act of 1977, an  
            individual to inquire and be notified as to whether a public  
            agency maintains a record about himself/herself.  Authorizes  
            the public agency to charge fees, if any, to an individual for  
            making copies of a record.  

          This bill:

          1.Makes it an unlawful practice for any person engaged in  
            publishing or otherwise disseminating a booking photograph  
            through a print or electronic medium to solicit or accept the  
            payment of a fee or other consideration to remove, correct, or  
            modify that booking photograph.

          2.Provides the following definitions:

             A.   "Booking photograph" means a photograph of a subject  
               individual taken pursuant to an arrest or other involvement  
               in the criminal justice system; and

             B.   "Subject individual" means an individual who was  
               arrested and had his/her booking photograph taken.

             C.   "Person" means a natural person, partnership, joint  
               venture, corporation, limited liability company, or other  
               entity.

          1.Authorizes a public entity to charge or collect a fee to  
            correct, modify, or remove a booking photograph.

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    SB 1027
                                                                     Page  
          3


          2.Provides that each payment solicited or accepted in violation  
            of this bill constitutes a separate violation.

          3.Provides that, in addition to any other sanctions, penalties,  
            or remedies provided by law, a subject individual who is  
            aggrieved by a violation of this bill's provisions may bring a  
            civil action in any court of competent jurisdiction against  
            any person in violation of this bill for damages in an amount  
            equal to the greater of $1,000 per violation or the actual  
            damages suffered by him or her as a result, along with costs,  
            reasonable attorney's fees, and any other legal or equitable  
            relief.

          4.Provides that the jurisdiction of the above civil action also  
            include the county in which the subject individual resides at  
            the time of the violation.

           Background
           
          In recent years, commercial Web sites have begun to extract and  
          compile criminal record information, including booking  
          photographs (mug shots), from certain police and sheriff's  
          department Web sites, post that information online, and charge  
          substantial fees to the subject of the criminal record  
          information to have that information removed.  This practice is  
          part of a growing niche industry, "the mug-shot racket."   
          According to a recent article, "[e]xploiting Florida's liberal  
          public-records laws and Google's search algorithms, a handful of  
          entrepreneurs are making real money by publicly shaming people  
          who've run afoul of Florida law.  Florida.arrests.org, the  
          biggest player, now hosts more than 4 million mugs.  On the  
          other side of the equation are firms like RemoveSlander,  
          RemoveArrest.com and others that sometimes charge hundreds of  
          dollars to get a mugshot [sic] removed.  On the surface, the  
          mug-shot sites and the reputation firms are mortal enemies.  But  
          behind the scenes, they have a symbiotic relationship that  
          wrings cash out of the people exposed. . . . None of this  
          appears to be illegal, but it demonstrates an unintended  
          consequence of state transparency laws."  (Cravats, Mug-Shot  
          Industry Will Dig Up Your Past, Charge You to Bury It Again  
          (Aug. 2, 2011)  
           [as of Mar.  
          27, 2014].)

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    SB 1027
                                                                     Page  
          4


          The mug shot business has now expanded to California and,  
          according to a recent Los Angeles Times article, is impacting  
          California residents by affecting their employment prospects and  
          causing humiliation.  (Lopez, Lawsuit targets website that posts  
          mug shots (Jan. 22, 2014)  
           [as of Mar. 27, 2014].)  Existing  
          California law requires public access to public agency  
          information but does not prohibit individuals from collecting  
          mug shots of individuals and charging exorbitant fees for  
          removal of the mug shots.

           Comment
           
          The author writes:

            Since 2010, there has been a proliferation of [Web sites] that  
            charge hundreds of dollars, and in some cases thousands of  
            dollars, to have police mug shots removed from their sites.   
            These fly-by-night enterprises often sully reputations and  
            hinder employment opportunities, regardless of whether charges  
            are dropped.

            While at least twenty states have introduced or passed  
            legislation to bar this extortion like practice, current  
            California law is permissive, allowing [Web sites] to charge  
            exorbitant fees to remove a mug shot from the internet.     

            For example, Bob DeBrino, a film producer who has worked with  
            such luminaries as director Sidney Lumet and actors Gary  
            Busey, Steve Baldwin and Vin Diesel, said his business deals  
            have collapsed since his DUI booking photo was posted on the  
            internet.

            The former New York City police officer was arrested by  
            Glendale police in January 2013 on suspicion of driving under  
            the influence of methadone and the prescription drug Adderall.  
             The medication was prescribed by doctors in preparation for  
            surgery.  The DUI charges were dropped after the Los Angeles  
            County District Attorney's Office rejected the case.

            But DeBrino's unflattering mug shot remains plastered on [Web  
            sites] that he said are demanding he pay them thousands of  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                    SB 1027
                                                                     Page  
          5

            dollars to take it down.  "This has been a damn nightmare,"  
            said DeBrino, who received dozens of citations for bravery  
            before retiring early from the NYPD due to injuries sustained  
            in the line of duty, including being shot while foiling a bank  
            robbery.  "It's about time to stand up to these con men who  
            are ruining lives."

            SB 1027 seeks to end the for-profit dissemination of arrest  
            information [and] would make it unlawful to solicit or accept  
            payment to remove, correct, or modify the criminal record  
            information.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No   Local:  
           No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  4/22/14)

          Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs
          California Law Enforcement Association of Records Supervisors,  
          Inc.
          California State Sheriffs' Association
          Legal Services for Prisoners with Children
          Los Angeles Protective League
          Riverside Sheriffs' Association


          AL:k  4/23/14   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****

Penalties for Violating the California Mugshot Law

If a website breaks the law, you can take legal action. Victims can file a civil lawsuit and seek:

  • $1,000 per violation or actual damages (whichever is greater)
  • Attorney’s fees and court costs

This gives people leverage to fight back against exploitative mugshot websites without needing to pay removal fees.

Looking for a broader or more specific solution? Start with our full guide on how to remove mugshots from Google.

Does the Law Apply to Police Departments or Official Records?

No. Public agencies, like police departments or court clerks, can still charge administrative fees to correct or update official records.

SB 1027 only applies to private websites and publishers that profit from mugshot removal. Official booking records remain public under California law, but commercial use is restricted.

Why California Passed SB 1027

Before SB 1027, mugshot sites were charging hundreds or even thousands of dollars to remove arrest photos, even for people who were never convicted. These practices damaged reputations, cost people jobs, and made it harder for individuals to move on from past mistakes.

By outlawing this business model, California aimed to protect residents from:

  • Public shaming for non-convictions
  • Predatory online removal fees
  • Lasting reputational harm caused by old arrests

Mugshots.com Owners Charged in California

In 2018, California made headlines when the owners of Mugshots.com were arrested and charged with extortion, money laundering, and identity theft.

Prosecutors alleged the site exploited thousands of people by posting their booking photos and demanding payment, often hundreds or even thousands of dollars, for removal. Victims included individuals whose cases were dismissed or never prosecuted.

The case highlighted why California passed SB 1027 and showed how seriously the state takes mugshot extortion. It also served as a warning to other pay-for-removal operators: this business model is illegal in California and can lead to criminal charges.

How to Remove a Mugshot in California

Even with SB 1027 in place, mugshots can still show up online. Here’s how to handle it:

1. Send a Formal Removal Request

If the site is violating SB 1027, send a written request stating:

  • Your full name
  • The URL of the mugshot page
  • A demand for removal under SB 1027

2. Document Everything

Save screenshots of the mugshot and any emails or payment demands from the site. This evidence can help if you need to file a lawsuit.

3. Take Legal Action if They Refuse

If the site ignores your request or demands money, you can pursue damages under SB 1027.

4. Suppress It from Search Results

Even after removal, old mugshot pages can linger in Google search results. You can request outdated content removal from Google or work with a reputation management service to push down harmful links.

FAQs About California's Mugshot Laws

Are mugshots public record in California
Yes. Mugshots are public records under California law, but SB 1027 restricts how private sites can use them. Law enforcement agencies can release them, but commercial pay-to-remove practices are banned.

Does SB 1027 automatically remove my mugshot?
No. The law bans pay-for-removal but doesn’t delete existing mugshots. You still need to request removal from the site or work with legal or reputation management services.

Can police in California post mugshots online?
Yes. Police can still release mugshots for public safety reasons or include them in press releases, but this does not give private sites the right to charge removal fees.

How much can I sue for under SB 1027?
You can seek the greater of $1,000 per violation or actual damages, plus attorney’s fees and legal costs.

How do I remove a mugshot from Google in California?
Once the mugshot is removed from the site, you can submit an Outdated Content Removal request to Google. If it’s still online, suppression and SEO strategies may be required to push it down.

Does SB 1027 apply to arrests that were expunged?
Yes. If your case was expunged, dismissed, or you were never convicted, the law still protects you from pay-to-remove schemes.

Key Takeaways

  • Illegal to charge removal fees: Private sites can’t profit from taking down booking photos.
  • $1,000+ fines per violation: Each unlawful removal request is enforceable in court.
  • Public agencies exempt: Police and court records remain public, but mugshot sites cannot exploit them commercially.
  • Protects against predatory sites: SB 1027 was designed to stop websites from profiting off reputational harm.

California’s mugshot law gives residents strong protections against pay-to-remove schemes, but it doesn’t automatically erase your booking photo from the internet. If your mugshot is still online, you can use SB 1027 to demand removal, or work with professionals to clean up your search results.

Get Started With Our Mugshot Removal Service today

Guaranteed Removals Mugshot Removal Service

Guaranteed Removals Mugshot removal service focuses on removing mugshots and criminal records from the internet, Google and other search engine providers. Our services aim to enhance your online reputation and build trust.

There is no obligation or risk. You only pay after we permanently remove the negative content from the source.

Get started and take control of your online presence today.

Learn more about removing mugshots from the internet

Picture of Travis Schreiber
Travis Schreiber
Travis Schreiber is a reputation management expert with extensive experience helping individuals and businesses protect their online presence.